OTTER Perkin-Elmer Spectrophotometer Data OTTER Data Description INVESTIGATOR: Lee F. Johnson Research Scientist TGS Technology Inc. NASA/Ames Research Center Moffett Field CA 94035 Requested Acknowledgement: Co-Author or Citation INTRODUCTION: Hemispherical reflectance of leaves throughout the 400- 2400nm region has been measured as an aid to understanding remotely sensed spectral data collected at approximately the same point in the growing season. Obtaining leaf spectra in the laboratory reduces or eliminates the confounding effects of atmosphere, platform instability, understory, exposed soils, mixed species, and canopy architecture which influence aircraft data. Of particular interest is the spectral influence of biochemical absorption by nitrogen, lignin, chlorophyll, starch and cellulose. Also of interest is examination of gross spectral properties such as the near-IR/red ratio and chlorophyll red-edge characteristics. These data may identify spectral regions upon which to concentrate aircraft data analysis, provide an input to leaf-level radiative transfer models, or provide a check for aircraft data which have been processed into reflectance. Five foliage samples were collected by shotgun or pruning pole from mid-upper canopy at each of the following OTTER sites: Scio (control/fertilized Western hemlock), Warings Woods (Douglas fir), Cascade Head (Western hemlock/red alder). Collection date was 3-4 June 1991. Each sample was separated into two portions, one for the spectral analysis reported here and another for chemical assay as part of the official Òoverflight dataset.Ó The chemistry data (TN, TP, amino acids, sugar, starch, chl-A, chl-B) and description are available through the Forest Science Data Bank at Oregon State University. Each spectral analysis sample was immediately inserted along with a wadded-up wet paper towel into a transparent plastic bag and sealed airtight. These were in turn inserted into black plastic bags to shield from light exposure, and stored either in ice chest or refrigerator until removed for spectral measurement. These measurements were made during the period 14-18 June 1991. The nearest Multisensor Aircraft Campaign to this time period occurred 15-22 May 1991. EQUIPMENT: Instrument: The spectrophotometer used was a Perkin-Elmer 330 resident at the Ecosystem Science and Technology Branch at NASA/Ames. Manufacturer: Perkin-Elmer Corp., Analytical Instruments Main Ave. (MS-12) Norwalk CT 06856 Key Variable: Hemispherical Reflectance -- Spectral Range: 400-2400nm Bandwidth: 6nm Sampling Interval: 2nm Calibration: One reflectance calibration standard, three wavelength standards, dark current, and background were measured. Standards manufactured by: Labsphere, Inc. Box 70 Shaker Street North Sutton, NH 03260 DATA MANIPULATION: For each sample, several needles including twig (or in the case of the alder, one entire leaf) were placed in the instrument sample holder, and scanned. The instrument produced raw reflectance for each scan by comparing target response with that of an aluminum- oxide standard of unknown (to the investigators) characteristics. Absolute reflectances reported to PLDS were developed by adjusting raw reflectance per channel by use of a spectralon reflectance standard (Labsphere SRS-75-020-4582-E) of known reflectance factor as follows: p(abs) = p(std) * [(x - xo) / (r - xo)], where: p(abs) = absolute reflectance of sample p(std) = reflectance factor of standard x = raw reflectance of foliage r = raw reflectance of standard xo = raw reflectance of dark current A localized smoothing operation was performed on each spectrum at about 875nm, to remove a spike which occurs due to detector change. QUALITY ASSESSMENT: The absolute reflectance reported to PLDS includes both diffuse and specular reflectance from leaf. The conifer samples typically covered 90-95% of the sample port; thus these measurements will include a component of direct reflectance from the background (which is on the order of 4% throughout the spectral range). No background was exposed to the detector during the alder scans. Because of the slow scan time (~20 minÕs/per scan), only one scan was taken of each sample. Therefore the standard deviation at each channel is unknown. No objective effort was made to control for either biomass or architecture presented to the instrument. This could account in part for variations in reflectance magnitude observed among scans. Particularly high variation is evident in the scans from the Warings Woods site. A residual effect of the spike described above may remain at about 875nm. These data are very noisy at wavelengths greater than 1900nm. The elapsed time between harvest and scan may have caused some biochemical differences to arise between the spectral samples and the corresponding assay samples. Wavelength accuracy was shown by the spectral calibration to be plus or minus 2 nm throughout the spectral range, and no adjustment was made to the measured spectra.