BOREAS TE-02 Continuous Wood Respiration Data

Summary

The BOREAS TE-02 team collected several data sets in support of its efforts to 
characterize and interpret information on the respiration of the foliage, roots, 
and wood of boreal vegetation.  This data set contains measurements of wood 
respiration measured continuously (about once per hour) in the NSA during the 
growing season of 1994. 

Table of Contents

   *  1 Data Set Overview
   *  2 Investigator(s)
   *  3 Theory of Measurements
   *  4 Equipment
   *  5 Data Acquisition Methods
   *  6 Observations
   *  7 Data Description
   *  8 Data Organization
   *  9 Data Manipulations
   *  10 Errors
   *  11 Notes
   *  12 Application of the Data Set
   *  13 Future Modifications and Plans
   *  14 Software
   *  15 Data Access
   *  16 Output Products and Availability
   *  17 References
   *  18 Glossary of Terms
   *  19 List of Acronyms
   *  20 Document Information

1. Data Set Overview

1.1 Data Set Identification

BOREAS TE-02 Continuous Wood Respiration Data

1.2 Data Set Introduction

Field studies of wood respiration were measured continuously on tree stems by an 
automated manifold for 3-6 days per Intensive Field Campaign (IFC) at the BOReal 
Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) Northern Study Area (NSA) in 1994.

1.3 Objectives/Purpose

The objectives of the work were to:

1) Determine whether respiratory parameters vary among three boreal tree species 
(black spruce, jack pine, and trembling aspen).
2) Compare respiration parameters from the cold northern sites with those from 
the warmer, southern sites.
3) Provide estimates of respiratory parameters for ecosystem process models.
4) Use our estimates of wood respiration, estimates of wood biomass, and wood 
temperature throughout the year to estimate the annual carbon cost for wood 
respiration.

1.4 Summary of Parameters

Each data record includes flow to chamber (ml/minute) @STP (101.300 KPa pressure 
and 0 �C), air temperature (�C), sapwood temperature (�C), CO2 reference (?L/L), 
CO2 difference (�L/L), air pressure (mbar), �mol/m2 bark/s (10-6 mol/m2 bark s-1), 
and Error Codes.

Error codes include:

Air Temperature < -5 or > 40 Degrees Celsius
CO2 Difference < 0 PPM
CO2 Reference < 345 Or > 600 PPM
Large Change In CO2 Ref Over Measurement Period
Low Return Flow From Chamber
Manifold Temperature < -5 Or > 35 Degrees Celsius
Sapwood Temperature < -5 Or > 35 Degrees Celsius

1.5 Discussion

In the NSA, the Terrestrial Ecology (TE)-02 team measured continuous wood 
respiration rates for Old Aspen (OA) (Populus tremuloides), Old Black Spruce 
(OBS) (Picea mariana), Old Jack Pine (OJP) (Pinus banksiana), and Young Jack 
Pine (YJP) in 1994 during June, July, and August--corresponding with the BOREAS 
IFCs.  These rates were used to estimate: 1) the response of CO2 evolution from 
wood to wood temperature, 2) any lag in wood CO2 efflux and wood temperature, 
and 3) the relationship between wood temperature and air temperature.

1.6 Related Data Sets

BOREAS TE-02 Foliage Respiration Data
BOREAS TE-02 Root Respiration Data
BOREAS TE-02 Stem Growth and Sapwood Data
BOREAS TE-02 Wood Respiration Data

2. Investigator(s)

2.1 Investigator(s) Name and Title

Dr. Michael G. Ryan
Dr. Michael Lavigne

2.2 Title of Investigation

Autotrophic Respiration in Boreal Ecosystems

2.3 Contact Information

Contact 1:
Dr. Michael G. Ryan
USDA Forest Service
Rocky Mountain Research Station
Fort Collins, CO 
(970) 498-1012
mryan@lamar.colostate.edu

Contact 2:
Dr. Michael Lavigne
Forestry Canada, Maritimes Region
Fredericton, New Brunswick
CANADA

Contact 3:
Andrea Papagno
Raytheon ITSS
NASA GSFC
Greenbelt, MD 
(301) 286-3134
(301) 286-0239 (fax)
Andrea.Papagno@gsfc.nasa.gov

3. Theory of Measurements

Respiration oxidizes sugars, producing energy, water, and CO2--and absorbing 
oxygen.  In most plant cells, the ratio between the oxygen absorbed and CO2 
produced in respiration is close to one.  Therefore, because small changes in 
CO2 concentration in the air are easier to measure than small changes in the 
oxygen content of the air, respiration is typically measured as CO2 evolution 
from plant tissues.  CO2 evolution is typically measured with an infrared gas 
analyzer (IRGA), operating in one of three modes: open, closed, or differential.  
The system that we used to measure stem wood respiration was an open system, 
which estimates molar flux of CO2 from plant tissue respiration as the 
difference between the CO2 concentration entering and exiting the chamber times 
the molar flow rate of air through the chamber (Field et al., 1991). Respiration 
of woody tissues is estimated as the CO2 efflux at the boundary of the bark�air 
interface.  Respiration rates are typically expressed as moles CO2 per m2 bark 
area per second. We assembled a sampling manifold to sequentially sample the CO2 
efflux from eight trees, once per hour.

Respiration of woody tissues will vary with temperature and sapwood volume, and 
perhaps with sapwood nitrogen, phosphorus or carbohydrate content.  Sampling for 
nitrogen, phosphorus, or carbohydrate content or determining sapwood cross-
sectional area of a stem involves destructive measurements.  Therefore, samples 
are generally taken after the respiration measurements have been completed.  
These characteristics are stored in a separate file and documented in TE-02 Stem 
Growth Sapwood Data.

4. Equipment

4.1 Instrument Description

4.1.1 Collection Environment

Respiration measurements were made in the field.  All other measurements took 
place under laboratory conditions.

4.1.2 Source/Platform

None given.

4.1.3 Source/Platform Mission Objectives

Not applicable.

4.1.4 Key Variables

Each data record includes flow to chamber (ml/minute) @STP (101.300 KPa pressure 
and 0 �C), air temperature (�C), sapwood temperature (�C), CO2 Reference (�L/L), 
CO2 difference (�L/L), air pressure (mbar), �mol/m2 bark/s (10-6 mol/m2 bark s-1), 
and error codes.

Error codes include:

Air Temperature < -5 Or > 40 Degrees Celsius
CO2 Difference < 0 PPM
CO2 Reference < 345 Or > 600 PPM
Large Change In CO2 Ref Over Measurement Period
Low Return Flow From Chamber
Manifold Temperature < -5 Or > 35 Degrees Celsius
Sapwood Temperature < -5 Or > 35 Degrees Celsius

4.1.5 Principles of Operation

The continuous measurements were made using a manifold and an open system (Field 
et al. 1991), controlled with a CR-21X datalogger (Campbell Scientific, Logan, 
UT, USA). The manifold system had two separate gas circuits: when CO2 efflux was 
being measured, inlet air was drawn through a 20-L mixing chamber (to provide a 
stable reference CO2 concentration), passed through the chamber at 270 �mol/s, 
and returned to the CO2 analyzer (ADC LCA2, ADC, Hoddeston, UK). Otherwise, inlet 
air was pushed through the chambers at 3.5 mmol/s (controlled with a mass flow 
controller), to keep CO2 concentration in the chamber at < 5 �mol/mol above 
ambient. CO2 efflux for each of eight chambers was sampled every 5 seconds for 8 
minutes, and only the last minute�s average data used for analysis and stored in 
the data base.  The remaining data were discarded because they represent 
nonequilibrium conditions. Methods are similar to those described in Ryan et al. 
(1995) and are more fully described in Lavigne and Ryan (1997).  For IFC-3 in 
NSA-OA, some of the chambers were covered with aluminum foil for 2-3 days to 
estimate refixation by bark photosynthesis.

4.1.6 Sensor/Instrument Measurement Geometry

None.

4.1.7 Manufacturer of Instrument

Ryan built the sampling manifold.  The datalogger and IRGA were from:

IRGA
LCA2
Analytical Development Company (ADC)
Hoddeston, Herts., UK
Distributed by:
Dynamax, Inc.
10808 Fallstone
Suite 350
Houston, TX 77099 USA
(281) 564-5100

CR-21X datalogger
Campbell Scientific, Inc.
815 West 1800 North 
Logan, UT 84321-1784
(435) 753-2342
(435) 750-9540 (fax)
support@campbellsci.com

4.2 Calibration

4.2.1 Specifications

We calibrated the IRGA to a concentration standard supplied by BOREAS prior to a 
measurement period for each IFC.  Typically, the analyzer will drifted less than 
2% between calibrations.  

4.2.1.1 Tolerance

We calibrated the IRGA to a concentration standard supplied by BOREAS prior to a 
measurement period for each IFC.  Typically, the analyzer drifted less than 2% 
between calibrations.

4.2.2 Frequency of Calibration

We calibrated the IRGA to a concentration standard supplied by BOREAS prior to a 
measurement period for each IFC.  Typically, the analyzer drifted less than 2% 
between calibrations.

4.2.3 Other Calibration Information

We calibrated the molar flow through the mass flow controller roughly every 
month with a bubble column.  We used standard meteorological pressure (reported 
at Thompson), corrected for elevation, and temperature from a copper-constantan 
thermocouple to calculate molar flow from the volume flow for this calculation.

5. Data Acquisition Methods

Continuous stem respiration was measured on eight trees at OJP, OBS, and OA 
sites in the NSA, once per IFC, and on six trees at YJP in NSA (only IFC-2). 
Tree diameters spanned the range of the stand.  At the OJP, OBS, and OA sites, 
aluminum chamber plates with an external neoprene gasket were attached to the 
north side of the tree with putty; loose bark was removed before attaching the 
chamber plate. Chambers were at 1.2-1.4 m height and at 6 m.  For CO2 efflux 
measurements, a Plexiglas chamber was sealed to the chamber plate with an 
elastic cord. The chamber area for OA, OBS, and OJP was 110 cm2.  That is 
counting 1/2 of the plate area (assuming 1/2 of the flux under the plate goes 
into the chamber and 1/2 does not).  The area inside the chamber is 80.5 cm2.  
For measurements at YJP, split Plexiglas chambers (23 cm in length) enclosed the 
entire stem, with neoprene gaskets creating a seal.  A small fan mixed the air 
in each chamber, and chambers were removed between measurements. Temperatures 
were measured at each tree. 

6. Observations

6.1 Data Notes

None.

6.2 Field Notes

None.

7. Data Description

7.1 Spatial Characteristics

7.1.1 Spatial Coverage

The measurement sites and associated North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83) 
coordinates are:

OA canopy access, site id T2Q6A, Lat/Long: 55.88691 N, 98.67479 W, Universal 
Transverse Mercator (UTM) Zone 14, N: 6,193,540.7, E: 520,342

OBS canopy access tower, site id T3R8T, Lat/Long: 55.88007 N, 98.48139 W, UTM 
Zone 14, N: 6,192,853.4, E: 532,444.5

OJP, site id T7Q8T, Lat/Long: 55.92842 N, 98.62396 W, UTM Zone 14, N: 
6,198,176.3, E: 523,496.2 

YJP, site id, T8S9T, Lat/Long: 55.89575 N, 98.28706 W, UTM Zone 14, N: 
6,194,706.9, E: 544,583.9

7.1.2 Spatial Coverage Map

Not available.

7.1.3 Spatial Resolution

These data are point source measurements at the given locations.

7.1.4 Projection

Not applicable.

7.1.5 Grid Description

Not applicable.

7.2 Temporal Characteristics

7.2.1 Temporal Coverage

We measured continuous wood respiration in 1994 during June, July, and August--
corresponding with the BOREAS IFCs 1, 2, and 3 at NSA-OBS, NSA-OJP, and NSA-OA.  
Continuous measurements were made at NSA-YJP during IFC-2.

7.2.2 Temporal Coverage Map

Each IFC at the OJP, OBS, and OA sites, CO2 efflux was measured once per hour 
for 3-6 days on eight chambers (four trees at 1.3 and 6 m) to determine 
temperature response; at YJP, continuous measurements were made for six trees 
only during the midsummer IFC.  Point measurements of CO2 flux were made every 
2-3 weeks at all sites for all chambers.

7.2.3 Temporal Resolution

None given.

7.3 Data Characteristics

Data characteristics are defined in the companion data definition file 
(te2wdrs2.def).

7.4 Sample Data Record

Sample data format shown in the companion data definition file (te2wdrs2.def).

8. Data Organization

8.1 Data Granularity

All continuous wood respiration data are in one file.

8.2 Data Format(s)

The data files contain numerical and character fields of varying length 
separated by commas. The character fields are enclosed with single apostrophe 
marks. There are no spaces between the fields. Sample data records are shown in 
the companion data definition file (te2wdrs2.def).

9. Data Manipulations

9.1 Formulae

None.

9.1.1 Derivation Techniques and Algorithms

None given.

9.2 Data Processing Sequence

None given.

9.2.1 Processing Steps

None given.

9.2.2 Processing Changes

None given.

9.3 Calculations

9.3.1 Special Corrections/Adjustments

Not applicable.

9.3.2 Calculated Variables

Not applicable.

9.4 Graphs and Plots

Not applicable.

10. Errors

10.1 Sources of Error

Sample trees were selected to represent the range of variability in respiration 
rates.  Because the IRGA could typically resolve a difference in concentration 
of CO2 of one ?mol/mol, lower respiration rates have more uncertainty in the 
measurement.

10.2 Quality Assessment

Flux rates of CO2 are likely to be accurate within +/- 5 percent.

10.2.1 Data Validation by Source

Data from the manifold were checked for internal consistency and against single 
chamber measurements with a portable gas analyzer, and potential errors were 
flagged.  Error codes are listed in Sections 1.4 and 4.1.4 and in the data file.

10.2.2 Confidence Level/Accuracy Judgment

None given.

10.2.3  Measurement Error for Parameters

Flux rates of CO2 are likely to be accurate within +/- 5 percent. Temperature of 
wood is likely to be accurate within +/- 0.3 �C.

10.2.4 Additional Quality Assessments

None given.

10.2.5 Data Verification by Data Center

Data were examined for general consistency and clarity.

11. Notes

11.1 Limitations of the Data

None given.

11.2 Known Problems with the Data

Processing Notes and missing data (also times for foil covering trees for the OA 
site in IFC-3):
                   1994     GMT
Site Tree Position Date     Time      Problem
OA   1    2        209      105       Bad Reference
OA   1    1        209      9         Bad Reference
OA   1    1        209      113       Bad Reference
OA   1    1        209      633       Bad Reference
OA   1    1        209      737       Bad Reference
OA   1    1        210      459       Bad Reference 
OA   2    2        209      17        Bad Reference
OA   4    1        212      655       Bad Reference
OA   1    2        258      1600      Covered with foil until Day 260 
                                      No apparent response
OA   1    1        258      1600      Covered with foil until Day 260 
                                      About 50% increase
OA   2    2        258      1210      Low readings after, leak?? 
                                      deleted all after
OA   3    2        258      1530      Bad Reference
OA   3    2        258      1600      Covered with foil until Day 260
OA   3    2        260      1022      Bad Flux
OA   3    1        258      1600      Covered with foil until Day 260
OA   4    1        257      31        Bad Flux
OA   4    1        258      1354      Bad Reference
OBS  1    2        261      1219      Bad Reference
OBS  1    1        263      711       Bad Reference
OBS  1    1        263      815       Bad Reference
OBS  2    2        261      1131      Bad Flux
OBS  2    2        261      1235      Bad Flux
OBS  2    2        265      2011      Bad Flux 
OBS  2    1        263      102       Bad Reference 
OBS  2    1        265      1147      Bad Flux
OBS  3    2        265      1051      Bad Flux
OBS  3    2        265      1155      Bad Flux
OBS  3    1        263      743       Bad Flux
OBS  3    1        263      847       Bad Flux
OBS  3    1        265      1202      Bad Flux
OBS  3    1        265      1515      Bad Flux
OBS  4    2        261      1203      Bad Flux
OBS  4    2        265      1419      Bad Flux
OBS  4    1        261      1107      High Flux at low temps
OBS  4    1        261      1211      High Flux at low temps
OBS  4    1        263      759       High Flux at low temps
OBS  4    1        263      903       High Flux at low temps
OBS  4    1        265      1010      High Flux at low temps
OBS  4    1        265      1115      High Flux at low temps
OBS  4    1        265      1427      High Flux at low temps
OJP  2    1        151      1931      Bad Reference
OJP  4    1        150      2258      Bad Reference
OJP  4    2        151      1923      Bad Reference
OJP  1    2        150-151  2300-2030 Bad Air Temp
OJP  1    1        150-151  2300-2030 Bad Air Temp
OJP  2    2        150-151  2300-2030 Bad Air Temp
OJP  2    1        150-151  2300-2030 Bad Air Temp
OJP  3    2        150-151  2300-2030 Bad Air Temp
OJP  3    1        150-151  2300-2030 Bad Air Temp
OJP  4    2        150-151  2300-2030 Bad Air Temp
OJP  4    1        150-151  2300-2030 Bad Air Temp
OJP  2    2        254      406       Bad Reference CO2
OJP  4    1        255      1809      Bad Sapwood Temperature
YJP  7    1        222      1005      Bad Reference CO2

11.3 Usage Guidance

None given.

11.4 Other Relevant Information

None given.

12. Application of the Data Set

These data can be used to study continuous wood respiration rates of boreal 
vegetation.

13. Future Modifications and Plans

None given.

14. Software

14.1 Software Description

None given.

14.2 Software Access

None given.

15. Data Access

15.1 Contact Information

Ms. Beth Nelson
BOREAS Data Manager
NASA GSFC
Greenbelt, MD
(301) 286-4005
(301) 286-0239 (fax)
Elizabeth.Nelson@gsfc.nasa.gov

15.2 Data Center Identification

See Section 15.1.

15.3 Procedures for Obtaining Data

Users may place requests by telephone, electronic mail, or fax.

15.4 Data Center Status/Plans

The TE-02 Continuous Wood Respiration data are available from the Earth 
Observing System Data and Information System (EOSDIS) Oak Ridge National 
Laboratory (ORNL) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC). The BOREAS contact 
at ORNL is: 

ORNL DAAC User Services
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(865) 241-3952
ornldaac@ornl.gov
ornl@eos.nasa.gov

16. Output Products and Availability

16.1  Tape Products

None.

16.2 Film Products

None.

16.3 Other Products

Tabular ASCII files.

17. References

17.1 Platform/Sensor/Instrument/Data Processing Documentation

None.

17.2 Journal Articles and Study Reports

Field, C.B., J.T. Ball, and J.A. Berry. 1991. Photosynthesis: principles and 
field techniques. In Plant Physiological Ecology, edited by R.W. Pearcy, J. 
Ehleringer, H.A. Mooney, and P.W. Rundel, Chapman and Hall, London, pp. 206-253.

Lavigne, M.B. and M.G. Ryan. 1997. Growth and maintenance respiration rates of 
aspen, black spruce and jack pine stems at northern and southern BOREAS sites. 
Tree Physiol., BOREAS Special Issue, 17:543-551.

Ryan, M.G., S.T. Gower, R.M. Hubbard, R.H. Waring, H.L. Gholz, W.P. Cropper, and 
S.W. Running.  1995. Woody tissue maintenance respiration of four conifers in 
contrasting climates. Oecologia 101:133-140.

Sellers, P. and  F. Hall. 1994. Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study: Experiment 
Plan. Version 1994-3.0, NASA BOREAS Report (EXPLAN 94). 

Sellers, P. and F. Hall. 1996. Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study: Experiment 
Plan. Version 1996-2.0, NASA BOREAS Report (EXPLAN 96). 

Sellers, P., F. Hall, and K.F. Huemmrich. 1996. Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere 
Study: 1994 Operations. NASA BOREAS Report (OPSDOC 94). 

Sellers, P., F. Hall, and K.F. Huemmrich. 1997. Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere 
Study: 1996 Operations. NASA BOREAS Report (OPSDOC 96). 

Sellers, P., F. Hall, H. Margolis, B. Kelly, D. Baldocchi, G. den Hartog, J. 
Cihlar, M.G. Ryan, B. Goodison, P. Crill, K.J. Ranson, D. Lettenmaier, and D.E. 
Wickland. 1995. The boreal ecosystem-atmosphere study (BOREAS): an overview and 
early results from the 1994 field year. Bulletin of the American Meteorological 
Society. 76(9):1549-1577. 

Sellers, P.J., F.G. Hall, R.D. Kelly, A. Black, D. Baldocchi, J. Berry, M. Ryan, 
K.J. Ranson, P.M. Crill, D.P. Lettenmaier, H. Margolis, J. Cihlar, J. Newcomer, 
D. Fitzjarrald, P.G. Jarvis, S.T. Gower, D. Halliwell, D. Williams, B. Goodison, 
D.E. Wickland, and F.E. Guertin. 1997. BOREAS in 1997: Experiment overview, 
scientific results, and future directions. JGR, BOREAS Special Issue, 102 (D24), 
28,731-28,769.

17.3 Archive/DBMS Usage Documentation

None.

18. Glossary of Terms

STP     - 101.300 KPa pressure and 0 �C

19. List of Acronyms

ADC     - Analytical Development Company
ASCII   - American Standard Code for Information Interchange
BOREAS  - BOReal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study
BORIS   - BOREAS Information System
CD-ROM  - Compact Disk-Read Only
CO2     - carbon dioxide
DAAC    - Distributed Active Archive Center
EOS     - Earth Observing System
EOSDIS  - EOS Data and Information System
GMT     - Greenwich Mean Time
GSFC    - Goddard Space Flight Center
HTML    - Hyper Text Markup Language
IFC     - Intensive Field Campaign
IRGA    - Infrared Gas Analyzer
MIX     - Mixed
NAD83   - North American Datum of 1983
NIR     - Near Infrared Radiation
NOAA    - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NSA     - Northern Study Area
OA      - Old Aspen
OBS     - Old Black Spruce
OJP     - Old Jack Pine
ORNL    - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
PANP    - Prince Albert National Park
PAR     - Photosynthetically Active Radiation
PPFD    - Photosynthetic Photon Flux Density
SSA     - Southern Study Area
TE      - Terrestrial Ecology
TF      - Tower Flux site
URL     - Uniform Resource Locator
UTM     - Universal Transverse Mercator
YA      - Young Aspen
YJP     - Young Jack Pine


20. Document Information

20.1 Documentation Revision Date

Written:  29-Sep-1998
Last Updated:  08-Dec-1998

20.2 Document Review Date(s)

BORIS Review:  29-Sep-1998
Science Review:

20.3 Document ID

20.4 Citation

Dr. Michael G. Ryan, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, and 
Dr. Michael Lavigne, Forestry Canada, Maritimes Region

20.5 Document Curator

20.6 Document URL

Keywords:
CO2 efflux
Gas exchange
Respiration
Stem respiration
Temperature
TE02_Wood_Resp_Cont.doc
01/13/99