BOREAS HYD-03 Tree Measurements

Summary

The BOREAS HYD-03 team collected several data sets related to the hydrology of 
forested areas. This data set contains measurements of canopy density (closure), 
stem density, and diameter at breast height (DBH) from a variety of sites.  
Canopy density measurements were made during the FFC-W  and FFC-T 1994 in both 
the SSA and NSA.  Stem density measurements were made during FFC-W 1996 in the 
SSA only.  Canopy density measurements were made using a forest densiometer, 
while measurements of stem density and DBH were made using standard techniques.  
This study was undertaken to predict spatial distributions of energy transfer, 
snow properties important to the hydrology, remote sensing signatures, and 
transmissivity of gases through the snow and their relation to forests in boreal 
ecosystems.  The data are available in tabular ASCII files.

Table of Contents

   *  1 Data Set Overview
   *  2 Investigator(s)
   *  3 Theory of Measurements
   *  4 Equipment
   *  5 Data Acquisition Methods
   *  6 Observations
   *  7 Data Description
   *  8 Data Organization
   *  9 Data Manipulations
   *  10 Errors
   *  11 Notes
   *  12 Application of the Data Set
   *  13 Future Modifications and Plans
   *  14 Software
   *  15 Data Access
   *  16 Output Products and Availability
   *  17 References
   *  18 Glossary of Terms
   *  19 List of Acronyms
   *  20 Document Information

1. Data Set Overview

1.1 Data Set Identification

BOREAS HYD-03 Tree Measurements

1.2 Data Set Introduction

This data set contains measurements of canopy density (closure), stem density, 
and DBH from a variety of sites.  Canopy density measurements were made during 
the FFC-W  and FFC-T 1994 in both the SSA and NSA.  Stem density measurements 
were made during FFC-W 1996 in the SSA only.  Canopy density measurements were 
made using a forest densiometer, while measurements of stem density and DBH were 
made using standard techniques.

1.3 Objective/Purpose

This study was undertaken to predict spatial distributions of energy transfer, 
snow properties important to the hydrology, remote sensing signatures, and 
transmissivity of gases through the snow and their relation to forests in boreal 
ecosystems.

1.4 Summary of Parameters

Parameters measured with respect to this documentation are canopy density 
(closure), stem density, and DBH.

1.5 Discussion

This study was conducted under the hypothesis that energy transfer and snow 
water equivalent (SWE) would vary spatially as a function of canopy closure.  
The goal was to obtain canopy closure data for determining either an average 
closure of a forest or the closure at a specific location (i.e., over a 
radiometer).  Data were compared with canopy data obtained from aerial 
photography.  Stem density data were used in calibrating a radiative transfer 
model for predicting incoming solar radiation at the snow surface in forested 
environments.

1.6 Related Data Sets

BOREAS Forest Cover Data Layers of the NSA-MSA in Raster Format

2. Investigator(s)

2.1 Investigator(s) Name and Title

Robert E. Davis, Research Physical Scientist
U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory (CRREL)

2.2 Title of Investigation

Distributed Energy Transfer Modeling in Snow and Soil for Boreal Ecosystems

2.3 Contact Information

Contact 1
------------
Janet P. Hardy            
U.S. Army CRREL             
Hanover, NH              
(603) 646-4306             
(603) 646-4278 (fax)             
jhardy@crrel.usace.army.mil

Contact 2
-----------
Dr. Robert E. Davis      
U.S. Army CRREL            
Hanover, NH             
(603) 646-4219           
(603) 646-4278 (fax) 
bert@crrel.usace.army.mil

Contact 3
-----------
David Knapp
NASA GSFC
Greenbelt, MD  
(301) 286-1424
(301) 286-0239 (fax)
David.Knapp@gsfc.nasa.gov

3. Theory of Measurements

The forest densiometer is used to obtain a quick measurement of overstory 
density at a point.  The instrument consists of a convex mirror with 24 1/4" 
squares engraved on the surface.  The mirror faces up, and the geometry of the 
overstory above is superimposed on the etched grid on the mirror. Canopy 
overstory is measured as described below.  Stem density is determined by 
counting the number of stems in a given area.  DBH is determined by measuring 
the circumference of the tree at breast height and converting it to diameter, or 
by using a tape measure that is pre-calibrated to DBH based on circumference.

4. Equipment

4.1 Sensor/Instrument Description

Forest densiometer.

4.1.1 Collection Environment

Data were collected during winter conditions.

4.1.2 Source/Platform

Densiometer is hand-held.

4.1.3 Source/Platform Mission Objectives

The measurements of canopy closure and stem density were undertaken primarily to 
aid in the snow melt modeling effort.  Stem density measurements were made at 
the location of the subcanopy radiation measurement.  This information is 
valuable for calibrating the model used to estimate subcanopy solar irradiance.

4.1.4 Key Variables

Canopy closure, stem density.

4.1.5 Principles of Operation

Canopy Density:

The forest densiometer is used to obtain a quick measurement of overstory 
density at a point.  The instrument consists of a convex mirror with 24 1/4" 
squares engraved on the surface.  The mirror faces up, and the geometry of the 
overstory above is superimposed on the etched grid on the mirror. Canopy 
overstory is measured as described in Section 5.

4.1.6 Sensor/Instrument Measurement Geometry

Not applicable.

4.1.7 Manufacturer of Sensor/Instrument

Densiometer:

Manufacturer:  Dr. Paul E. Lemmon
Distributor:
Forestry Suppliers, Inc.
205 West Rankin St.
P.O. Box 8397
Jackson, MS  39284-8397
(800) 647-5368

4.2 Calibration

Not applicable.

4.2.1 Specifications

Not available.

4.2.1.1 Tolerance

Not available.

4.2.2 Frequency of Calibration

Not applicable.

4.2.3 Other Calibration Information

A report by Ganey and Block, 1994 (complete reference given in Section 17.1), 
compared the densiometer with another technique for measuring canopy density.  
Although they were unable to determine which technique provided the most
accurate measurement, they believe that for point measurements the densiometer 
is the best available �quick and easy� method.  They did conclude, however, 
that the densiometer can yield different results when used by different 
observers.  This problem was minimized in these data (see Section 10.1).

5. Data Acquisition Methods

Canopy Density:

Once sites were located, the densiometer was used to determine the canopy 
density at that site.  The densiometer was held at waist height and far enough 
from the observer�s body so that his or her head was not visible in the mirror.  
The instrument was then leveled using the built-in bubble level.  For each of 
the 24 etched squares, the square was divided into quarters and the number of 
quarter sections covered by canopy (1, 2, 3, or 4) was counted.  The total 
number of quarter sections was recorded (up to 96 possible).  Keeping the 
densiometer in the same location, the observer then rotated 90 degrees and 
counted again. This process was repeated until the canopy closure sections were 
counted in all four directions, and the four totals were recorded.  The average 
of the four totals, was then multiplied by 1.04 to determine the canopy closure 
at that site (see formula in Section 9.1).

Stem Density:

To obtain a measurement of stem density, the area was measured and marked
(e.g., 20 m x 25 m), and every stem inside the marked area was counted.
The number of stems was divided by the area to get the stem density (see
formula in Section 9.1).

DBH:

In the case of the Southern Study Area (SSA)-Old Aspen (OA) site, the diameter 
at breast height (DBH) of each tree in the marked area was also measured.

6. Observations

6.1 Data Notes

None.

6.2 Field Notes

None.

7. Data Description


7.1 Spatial Characteristics


7.1.1 Spatial Coverage

Canopy Density:

The canopy density measurements were collected at the following approximate 
locations:

SITE_ID                    LONGITUDE   LATITUDE
------------------------- ---------- ----------
SSA-OJP-FLXTR-HYD03-CND01 -104.69203   53.91634
NSA-OJP-FLXTR-HYD03-CND02  -98.62028   55.93011
NSA-OBS-FLXTR-HYD03-CND02  -98.48027    55.8801
NSA-YJP-FLXTR-HYD03-CND04  -98.29027   55.90011
NSA-YJP-FLXTR-HYD03-CND03  -98.29027   55.90011
NSA-YJP-FLXTR-HYD03-CND01  -98.29027   55.90011
NSA-OJP-FLXTR-HYD03-CND03  -98.62028   55.93011
NSA-OBS-FLXTR-HYD03-CND01  -98.48027    55.8801
NSA-OBS-FLXTR-HYD03-CND03  -98.48027    55.8801
NSA-YJP-FLXTR-HYD03-CND02  -98.29027   55.90011
SSA-999-NIB01-HYD03-CND02 -104.59484   53.75285
SSA-999-NIB01-HYD03-CND03 -104.59484   53.75285
SSA-9OA-FLXTR-HYD03-CND01 -106.19051   53.63005
NSA-9BS-HYD3A-HYD03-CND01  -97.89026   55.81011
NSA-YBS-HYD03-HYD03-CND02  -97.87026   55.83011
NSA-MIX-HYD03-HYD03-CND03  -97.84025   55.85011
NSA-9BS-HYD3B-HYD03-CND04  -97.82025   55.87011
SSA-BSH-110G1-HYD03-CND01 -105.81221   54.52526
SSA-ASP-110H1-HYD03-CND01  -105.8067   54.50956
SSA-999-110I1-HYD03-CND01  -105.8098   54.49536
SSA-BRN-110J1-HYD03-CND01  -105.8123   54.48146
SSA-ASP-110K1-HYD03-CND01    -105.81   54.46696
SSA-CLR-110L1-HYD03-CND01  -105.8024   54.43746
NSA-OJP-FLXTR-HYD03-CND01  -98.62028   55.93011
SSA-YJP-122D1-HYD03-CND01 -104.61914   53.84426
SSA-999-122E1-HYD03-CND01 -104.61944   53.84916
SSA-MIX-122F1-HYD03-CND01 -104.62214   53.85586
SSA-MIX-122G1-HYD03-CND01 -104.60623   53.89836
SSA-MIX-HYD03-HYD03-CND0A -104.58044   53.80006
SSA-MIX-HYD03-HYD03-CND0T -104.58044   53.80006
SSA-MIX-HYD03-HYD03-CND0S -104.58044   53.80006
SSA-999-NIB01-HYD03-CND01 -104.59484   53.75285
SSA-9JP-110A1-HYD03-CND01 -105.83864   54.60117
SSA-MIX-110B1-HYD03-CND01 -105.82606   54.58848
SSA-MIX-110C1-HYD03-CND01 -105.82461   54.57386
SSA-MIX-110D1-HYD03-CND01 -105.81851   54.56146
SSA-ASP-110E1-HYD03-CND01 -105.81461   54.54696
SSA-ASP-110F1-HYD03-CND01 -105.81301   54.53426


The stem density measurements were made near the SSA-Old Black Spruce (OBS) and 
SSA-OA towers. DBH was also measured at the SSA-OA site.

SITE_ID                    LONGITUDE   LATITUDE
------------------------- ---------- ----------
SSA-9OA-FLXTR-HYD03-STD01 -106.19779   53.62889
SSA-OBS-FLXTR-HYD03-STD01 -105.11779   53.98717

7.1.2 Spatial Coverage Map

Not available.

7.1.3 Spatial Resolution

Canopy density:

The areas over which measurements of canopy density were made range from 25 to 
500 square meters. 

Stem density:

At the SSA-OBS and SSA-OA sites, the area covered was approximately 500 square 
meters.

The DBH was measured only at the SSA-OA site.

7.1.4 Projection

These data were collected at various points whose coordinates are given in 
latitude and longitude in the North American Datum of 1983 (NAD83).

7.1.5 Grid Description

Not applicable.

7.2 Temporal Characteristics

7.2.1 Temporal Coverage

Focused Field Campaign-Winter (FFC-W) and Focused Field Campaign-Thaw (FFC-T)  
1994  (Canopy Density)
FFC-W 1996 (Stem Density)

7.2.2 Temporal Coverage Map

Canopy Density

   Dates        Site
-----------     ------
07-FEB-1994     Montreal Lake
08-FEB-1994     SSA-Old Jack Pine (OJP), SSA-Young Jack Pine (YJP)
09-FEB-1994     SSA Highway 106 at Triple Junction
10-FEB-1994     SSA-OA
13-FEB-1994     NSA Gillam Road
14-FEB-1994     NSA-YJP
15-FEB-1994     NSA-OJP
16-FEB-1994     NSA-OBS
24-APR-1994     NSA-OBS
26-APR-1994     NSA-YJP


Stem Density

   Dates        Site
-----------     ------
03-MAR-1996     SSA-OBS
08-MAR-1996     SSA-OA


DBH

   Dates        Site
-----------     ------
08-MAR-1996     SSA-OA

7.2.3 Temporal Resolution

In most cases, these measurements were taken only one time for each site.

7.3 Data Characteristics

Data characteristics are defined in the companion data definition files 
(h03candd.def), (h03stdnd.def), and (h03dbhd.def).

7.4 Sample Data Record

Sample data format shown in the companion data definition files (h03candd.def), 
(h03stdnd.def), and (h03dbhd.def).

8. Data Organization

8.1 Data Granularity

All of the Tree Measurement Data are contained in three datasets.

8.2 Data Format(s)

The data files contain numerical and character fields of varying length 
separated by commas. The character fields are enclosed with  a single apostrophe 
marks. There are no spaces between the fields.  Sample data records are shown in 
the companion data definition files (h03candd.def), (h03stdnd.def), and 
(h03dbhd.def).

9. Data Manipulations

9.1 Formulae

Canopy Closure = Average of four counts x 1.04 = canopy closure (%)

Stem Density = Number of stems in measured area divided by measured area

9.1.1 Derivation Techniques and Algorithms

None.

9.2 Data Processing Sequence

None, other than what is indicated above.

9.2.1 Processing Steps

Use formula above to calculate canopy density

9.2.2 Processing Changes

Not applicable.

9.3 Calculations


9.3.1 Special Corrections/Adjustments

Not applicable.

9.3.2 Calculated Variables

None.

9.4 Graphs and Plots

Not applicable.

10. Errors

10.1 Sources of Error

Different operators of the densiometer may produce different results, depending 
on the operator�s familiarity with the technique.  For this reason, the canopy 
density data were consistently measured by the same person.

The other potential error is in the ability of the operator to hold the
densiometer level during a measurement.  Ganey and Block (1994) suggest using a 
tripod to reduce error caused by observer movement.  For this study, a
tripod was not used in measurements of canopy density.

10.2 Quality Assessment

10.2.1 Data Validation by Source

Aerial photography and forest cover data of the BOREAS Northern Study Area 
(NSA), provided by Manitoba Natural Resources of Winnipeg, were used to confirm 
measured canopy closures. BORIS staff used the forest cover data set is at a 
scale of 1:15,840, to extract and grid the species cover and crown closure. 
Image analysis classified the YJP forest in the canopy closure class "31 to 50 
%", and the OJP and OBS forests both fell in the canopy closure class of "71% 
and over." Canopy closure measurements using the densiometer compared favorably 
with those determined from the aerial photo data (NSA, YJP = 42%; NSA, OJP = 
86%; and NSA, OBS = 83%). 

10.2.2 Confidence Level/Accuracy Judgment

The confidence level and accuracy of the canopy closure measurements is 
dependent on scale.  One measure of canopy closure at a point, with its 
associated spatial resolution, provides a reliability of about +/-1.3% (Lemmon, 
1957).  To accurately characterize a forest canopy closure, several measurements 
with the densiometer should be made to account for the natural variability. The 
more measurements made, the greater the confidence in the data.

10.2.3 Measurement Error for Parameters

Not available.

10.2.4 Additional Quality Assessments

Not applicable.

10.2.5 Data Verification by Data Center

Data that was loaded into the data tables were spot checked against the original 
ASCII data that was submitted to check for data loading errors.

11. Notes

11.1 Limitations of the Data

These data were collected in winter.  Canopy closure measurements in deciduous 
forests will be very different when leaves are on the trees.

11.2 Known Problems with the Data

None.

11.3 Usage Guidance

None given.

11.4 Other Relevant Information

None given.

12. Application of the Data Set

This data set provides data specific to selected sites for the purpose of
calibrating radiative transfer and snow melt models.  It may also be used
as "ground truth" for comparison with forest cover maps.

13. Future Modifications and Plans

None given.

14. Software

14.1 Software Description

An undetermined spreadsheet software package was used to organize the data.

14.2 Software Access

None given.

15. Data Access (This section for BORIS and ORNL DAAC Use)

15.1 Contact Information

Ms. Beth Nelson
BOREAS Data Manager
NASA GSFC
Greenbelt, MD 
(301) 286-4005
(301) 286-0239 (fax)
beth@ltpmail.gsfc.nasa.gov

15.2 Data Center Identification

See Section 15.1.

15.3 Procedures for Obtaining Data

Users may place requests by telephone, electronic mail, or fax. 
visit.

15.4 Data Center Status/Plans

The HYD-03 tree measurement data are available from the EOSDIS ORNL DAAC (Earth 
Observing System Data and Information System) (Oak Ridge National Laboratory) 
(Distributed Active Archive Center).

The BOREAS contact at ORNL is:

ORNL DAAC User Services
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
(865) 241-3952
ornldaac@ornl.gov
ornl@eos.nasa.gov

16. Output Products and Availability

16.1 Tape Products

Contact BORIS staff.

16.2 Film Products

None.

16.3 Other Products

Contact BORIS staff.

17. References

17.1 Platform/Sensor/Instrument/Data Processing Documentation

Ganey, J.L., W.M. Block. 1994. A comparison of two techniques for measuring 
canopy closure, Western Jour. Appl. Forestry 9(1)21-23. 

Lemon, P.E. 1957. A new instrument for measuring forest overstory density.  
Journal of Forestry, 55(9)667-668. 

Lemon, P.E. 1956. A spherical densiometer for estimating forest overstory 
density.  Forest Science, 2(4)314-320.

17.2 Journal Articles and Study Reports

Davis, R.E., C. Woodcock, and J.P. Hardy. 1996. Toward spatially distributed 
modeling of snow in the boreal forest.  Eos Transactions, AGU 1995 Fall Meeting, 
Abstract, p. 218.

Davis, R.E., J.P. Hardy, W. Ni, C. Woodcock, C.J. McKenzie, R. Jordan, and
X. Li. 1997.  Variation of snow ablation in the boreal forest: A sensitivity 
study on the effects of conifer canopy.  Journal of Geophysical Research. 
102(D24):29389-29396.

Hardy, J.P., R.E. Davis, and G.C. Winston. 1995.  Evolution of factors
affecting gas transmissivity of snow in the boreal forest.  In:
Biogeochemistry of Seasonally Snow-Covered Catchments (ed. by K. Tonnessen,
M.W. Williams, and M. Tranter)  (Proc. Boulder Symp., July 1995). IAHS
publication no. 228, p. 51-60.

Hardy, J.P., R.E. Davis, and R. Jordan. 1996. Snow melt modeling in the boreal
forest. Eos Transactions, AGU 1996 Fall Meeting, abstract, p. 196.

Hardy, J.P., R.E. Davis, R. Jordan, X. Li, C. Woodcock, W. Ni, and J.C.
McKenzie. 1997.  Snow ablation modeling at the stand scale in a boreal
jack pine forest.  Journal of Geophysical Research. 102(D24): 29397-29406.

Sellers, P. and F. Hall. 1994. Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study: Experiment 
Plan. Version 1994-3.0, NASA BOREAS Report (EXPLAN 94). 

Sellers, P. and F. Hall. 1996. Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study: Experiment 
Plan. Version 1996-2.0, NASA BOREAS Report (EXPLAN 96). 

Sellers, P., F. Hall, and K.F. Huemmrich. 1996. Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere 
Study: 1994 Operations. NASA BOREAS Report (OPS DOC 94). 

Sellers, P., F. Hall, and K.F. Huemmrich. 1997. Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere 
Study: 1996 Operations. NASA BOREAS Report (OPS DOC 96). 

Sellers, P.J., F.G. Hall, R.D. Kelly, A. Black, D. Baldocchi, J. Berry, M. Ryan, 
K.J. Ranson, P.M. Crill, D.P. Lettenmaier, H. Margolis, J. Cihlar, J. Newcomer, 
D. Fitzjarrald, P.G. Jarvis, S.T. Gower, D. Halliwell, D. Williams, B. Goodison, 
D.E. Wickland, F.E. Guertin. 1997. BOREAS in 1997: Experiment overview, 
scientific results, and future directions. Journal of Geophysical Research. 
102(D24):28731-28770.

Sellers, P., F. Hall, H. Margolis, B. Kelly, D. Baldocchi, G. den Hartog, J. 
Cihlar, M.G. Ryan, B. Goodison, P. Crill, K.J. Ranson, D. Lettenmaier, and D.E. 
Wickland. 1995. The boreal ecosystem-atmosphere study (BOREAS): an overview and 
early results from the 1994 field year. Bulletin of the American Meteorological 
Society. 76(9):1549-1577. 

Winston, G.C., B.B. Stephens, E.T. Sundquist, J.P. Hardy, and R.E. Davis.
1995.  Seasonal variability in gas transport through snow in a boreal
forest.  In:  Biogeochemistry of Seasonally Snow-Covered Catchments (ed. by
K. Tonnessen, M.W. Williams, and M. Tranter)  (Proc. Boulder Symp., July
1995). IAHS publication no. 228, p. 61-70.

17.3 Archive/DBMS Usage Documentation

None.

18. Glossary of Terms

None.

19. List of Acronyms

BOREAS  - BOReal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study
BORIS   - BOREAS Information System
BS      - Black Spruce
CGR     - Certified by Group
CPI     - Checked by Principal Investigator
CPI-??? - CPI but questionable
CRREL   - Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory
DAAC    - Distributed Active Archive Center
DBH     - Diameter at Breast Height
EOS     - Earth Observing System
EOSDIS  - EOS Data and Information System
FFC-W   - Focused Field Campaign - Winter
FFC-T   - Focused Field Campaign - Thaw
GMT     - Greenwich Mean Time
GSFC    - Goddard Space Flight Center
HYD     - Hydrology
NAD83   - North American Datum of 1983
NASA    - National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NSA     - Northern Study Area
OA      - Old Aspen
OBS     - Old Black Spruce
OJP     - Old Jack Pine
ORNL    - Oak Ridge National Laboratory
PANP    - Prince Albert National Park
PRE     - Preliminary
SSA     - Southern Study Area
URL     - Uniform Resource Locator
YBS     - Young Black Spruce
YJP     - Young Jack Pine

20. Document Information

20.1 Document Revision Date

     Written: 23-Apr-1997
     Revised: 19-Mar-1998

20.2 Document Review Date(s)

     BORIS Review:   12-Mar-1998
     Science Review: 15-Jul-1997
 
20.3 Document ID

20.4 Citation

20.5 Document Curator

20.6 Document URL

Keywords

CANOPY DENSITY
STEM DENSITY
DBH




HYD03_Tree_Meas.doc
Page 14 of 16
04/17/98